I uniformed to $Id$ since not only there was a Id/Revision+Date mixed
use, but somewhere the tag was not used at all, and the majority of
replied with a preference of Id

thanks and best,
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/


On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 15:38, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 19 July 2012 07:54, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Seb,
>>>
>>>> So long as the $Date$ ones are removed, I don't think it matters
>>>> whether the others use Revision or Id.
>>>
>>> thanks for the feedback! since in the code on /trunk there is a mixed
>>> use of both $Id$ and $Revision$, would it worth have a  uniformed way?
>>
>> Why bother? Just replace the ones with $Date$ and leave the rest.
>
> Personally, I like the consistency of having $id throughout.
>
> Gary
>
>>
>>> TIA,
>>> -Simo
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 1:12 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 18 July 2012 21:35, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> we discussed already a lot on this for other components, anyway it
>>>>> would be better discussing it before modifying the code:
>>>>>
>>>>> * is it OK to drop @author tags? original authors, committers and
>>>>> contributors are already mentioned in the pom
>>>>>
>>>>> * @version: actually, there is a mix of $Id$, $Revision$ and $Date$
>>>>> usage. Is it OK to replace all of them with $Id$ only?
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> TIA! best,
>>>>> -Simo
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to