2012/7/9 Gilles Sadowski <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 01:49:25PM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
>> Hello,
>> most existing methods in class RealVector allow method chaining.
>
> Chaining does not always make for readable code.
>
>> However, some methods just return void instead of this
>> - addToEntry
>> - set
>> - setEntry
>> - setSubVector
>> - unitize
>>
>> Are you OK with having all or only some (which ones) methods return this?
>
> +0 (for people who like it).
>
I agree, I generally find confusing methods which return {@code this},
but I have to admit that in this context, a fluent interface is very
useful.
Sébastien
>
> [And for API consistency.]
>
>
> Gilles
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
