+1 to java 6 and using the new interfaces, removing classes that can be replaced with Java 6 code.
Gary On Jul 4, 2012, at 4:32, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: > FWIW, +1 as well!!! :) > > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Jörg Schaible > <joerg.schai...@scalaris.com> wrote: >> Stephen Colebourne wrote: >> >>> On Java 5/6, I'm in favour of Java 6 at this point. To justify it for >>> Sebb, someone needs to check to see if any collections in >>> [collections] could implement the new interfaces added in Java 6 - >>> NavigableSet, NavigableMap and so on. >> >> I am definitely +1 here. Java 6 comes with more interesting interfaces >> (Deque) and implementations (ArrayDeque explicitly as replacement for Stack) >> that make more of our stuff obsolete. >> >> Anyone who still uses Java 5 has either made the best of 4-year-old cc3 or >> switched to a different library. And in the light that Java 6 is probably >> EOL before we release cc4, I see also no reason to stick with Java 5. >> >> - Jörg >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
