Le 29/05/2012 06:21, Sébastien Brisard a écrit : > Hello, >> >> I don't see why there should be a consensus to remove something that was >> never there in the first place. The vast majority of such exception >> instantiations do not perform explicit conversion; so I'd be inclined to >> think that there should be a consensus to change that. >> >> >> Best regards, >> Gilles >> > while I agree with you, I do not really know what to do: am I to > ignore this -1 on one of my commits? This goes against the rules. > In its latest state, the code I've committed uses auto-boxing.
+1 to revert to no explicit conversion in this specific case (i.e. it is only an exception message, not a result computation, so it is worth having simple code). -1 to a general catch all rule, I guess the need for complicated code is really context dependent. Luc > > Best regards, > Sébastien > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
