Thanks. We to we're taken by surprise by this as it was not discussed prior to the change. As a rule the minimum version should only be changed if something requires it. I'm waiting for a response from Gary as to why this was necessary before asking him to revert it.
Ralph On May 14, 2012, at 2:50 AM, Andreas Persson <andreas.pers...@idainfront.se> wrote: >> FYI: I've updated VFS trunk to Java 6 to avoid getting stuck on older >> versions of jars and further moving VFS in the 21st century ;) Tasked >> as VFS-415. > > I was happy to see VFS-414 and VFS-313 being fixed, thank you very much for > that! The change in VFS-415 however makes it impossible for us to use VFS 2.1 > (we have several jboss 4 installations left, and jboss 4 doesn't support jdk > 6). I just wanted you to know that there still are VFS users that depend on > jdk 1.5 compatibility. > > /Andreas > > Т���������������������������������������������������������������������ХF�V�7V'67&�&R�R���âFWb�V�7V'67&�&T6�����2�6�R��&pФf�"FF�F����6����G2�R���âFWbֆV�6�����2�6�R��&p� --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
