sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >On 12 April 2012 20:46, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: >> 1. Fix all the open bugs. DONE - until someone opens another Jira ;) >> 2. Clean up the docs. TODO >> 3. Release 2.0.0.M1 >> 4. Work on DBCP2, updating POOL2 as required (e.g. moving the >abandoned >> object code to POOL2) >> 5. React to feedback on 2.0.0.M1 >> 6. Release 2.0.0.Mn as required >> 7. Release 2.0.0 >> >> Thoughts? Comments? Feedback? > >Not sure we should release 2.0.0; I would expect the first release to >be 2.0.
To my mind all versions should use three digits for consistency but that is just me. >If there needs to be minor update, then the next release would be >2.0.1. > >I'm more used to -alphaN and betaN suffixes. >Not sure what milestones mean in terms of code quality and API >stability. Alpha/beta is fine by me. >> The one issue I have is that I have no clue how the release process >for >> POOL works. I see the scripts Phil wrote but do not immediately see >how >> they'd work with the plan above (also note I know nothing about >Maven). >> Help appreciated. > >I think the scripts are a bit outdated. > >Now we use Nexus, "mvn deploy <options>" is usually all that is needed. Ah. Maven magic I don't understand. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
