Hola, yes I think that having the "common denominator" would help on avoiding to repeat ourselves in various implementations. Methods in the AbstractExporter could be even final, no needs to provide same implementation in the different exporters.
All the best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Claudio Squarcella <squar...@dia.uniroma3.it> wrote: > Hi Simone, > > > On 20/03/2012 17:35, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> >> OH :( I liked the fact that commons properties were defined just once >> in the Abstract impl :( > > > I did it after realizing that the DOT language does not support weights on > vertices. Of course I could have kept the others (withEdgeWeights, > withVertexLabels, etc), but we could face the same problem if later we > introduce a new format that does not support e.g. labels... > > WDIT? do you want me to reintegrate the "common denominator" for now? > > Claudio > > -- > Claudio Squarcella > PhD student at Roma Tre University > http://www.dia.uniroma3.it/~squarcel > http://twitter.com/hyperboreans > http://claudio.squarcella.com/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
