Hi all,

whatever name/pattern is called what we intend to apply, the result
doesn't change :P

Jokes a part, given the past experience of Digester3, as reported by
Matt and James, I can suggest you to not limit to users the
possibilities to chose their preferred approaches.

Digester3 - which of course has a larger set of APIs - allows users
configuring it with four APIs set:

 * plain old Digester2.X addRule() alike methods;
 * the RulesBinder fluent APIs;
 * Annotated POJOs, built on top of RulesBinder;
 * XML descriptors, built on top of RulesBinder.

no restrictions - just provide the n API layers that users want/need
on top of one in order to centralize the errors and make them
satisfied (which is he most important side, IMHO).
When developing Digester3, I wondered who would have used the xmlrules
today: pooff, magically a users not only is using it, he's also
contributing on making it betetr on supporting multi-thread
environments.

So, concluding: instead of choosing which approach has to be applied,
just apply both as Seb is proposing.
Just my 0.02 cents,
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/



On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:40 PM, James Carman
<jcar...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> Did I say they were the same?
> On Mar 16, 2012 12:22 PM, "Emmanuel Bourg" <ebo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Le 16/03/2012 13:34, James Carman a écrit :
>>
>>> +1 for builder pattern and fluent API
>>>
>>
>> Fluent API != Builder Pattern
>>
>> They are similar because they use method chaining, but that's not
>> equivalent.
>>
>> http://martinfowler.com/bliki/**FluentInterface.html<http://martinfowler.com/bliki/FluentInterface.html>
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Fluent_interface<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluent_interface>
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Builder_pattern<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Builder_pattern>
>>
>>
>> Emmanuel Bourg
>>
>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>> dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to