On 9 March 2012 08:00, Luc Maisonobe <luc.maison...@free.fr> wrote:
> Le 09/03/2012 03:03, sebb a écrit :
>> Some while back, we discussed including binary (and source) jars for
>> the test code in releases.
>> [The test source code is already included in the source archive].
>>
>> The intention was to make it easier to run binary compatibility tests
>> against new releases.
>
> Yes, I remember you raised important compatibility issues when we tried
> to release 2.1, so it saved us from doing big mistakes.
>
>>
>> I think it would be worth adding this to the release profile.
>> The effect will be to create 2 more jars.
>
> +1
>
>>
>> Ideally the test.jar should be included in the binary zip/tar files.
>
> -1. I think it should be separated. As our components are picked up as
> dependencies to higher level projects, they don't always know precisely
> how they are managed. So the jar may end up in there top level
> application just because they throw everything they find the binary
> distribution in.

OK, that simplifies matters.

>> That will have to be done by each component as it will usually require
>> an edit to the assembly descriptor.
>> But in any case the jars would be available from the Maven repo if required.
>
> +1
>
> Luc
>
>>
>> OK?
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to