> >That's not the right conclusion. >If there had been arguments against including <some feature>, you >would have >gotten a response. :-)
You are totally right Gilles , I apologize for jumping to that conclusion. > >The central point is: It's is not primarily other people that have >to be >interested in a feature (that you would develop) but yourself; and >most >importantly, developing a feature implies that you would be ready >to support >it. I am actually interested in both developing such feature and making a commitment to support it. >IMHO, that would also rule out developing something as a >programming >exercise, when there is a chance that nobody will use it (if even >you >don't). In that situation, there is the danger to not discover >shortcomings >of the implementation that appear more clearly when you apply it to >real-world problems. I totally agree with you. ;) > >> [...] > > >Regards, >Gilles > >------------------------------------------------------------------- >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
