Hello. > after reading the issue MATH-751[1] about computational geometry > algorithms I realized it could make sense to look at what we already > did in [graph], especially in terms of data structures. Things like > triangulations, Voronoi diagrams, etc. would need graph > representations anyway -- IMHO [math]ers should avoid to reinvent > the wheel and/or create a different representation for graphs. > > Of course the downside is that [graph] in currently in Sandbox > without a Release. Still, if we agree that it would make sense to > "link" the two, maybe it is worth to wait a bit more for MATH-751 > until [graph] is ready (we're working on that!). > > Looking forward to comments!
In principle, +1 for sharing. But this will bring back the issue that some people did not want Commons Math to have any external dependencies... Best regards, Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
