On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Feb 17, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Really? I've gotten so used to putting the '{' at the end of the line > >> that I assumed VFS was that way. > >> > > > > I'm happy to change the style to what we both seem to consider normal > but I > > am not sure what the rest of the community feels like... > > That seems like way too much effort for very little benefit. In fact, > when I created the checkstyle configuration I started from the one used by > Commons Configuration and then tweaked it to shut up a bunch of the > "errors" I didn't care about and that seemed to have been the convention of > the existing code base. I'd prefer that all of commons use the same > checkstyle configuration. > +1, that would be great, we could put it in the parent POM and be done with it once and for all. Can you have a checkstyle.xml reused that way? Gary > > Ralph > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
