On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>wrote:
>
> On Feb 17, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Really? I've gotten so used to putting the '{' at the end of the line
> >> that I assumed VFS was that way.
> >>
> >
> > I'm happy to change the style to what we both seem to consider normal
> but I
> > am not sure what the rest of the community feels like...
>
> That seems like way too much effort for very little benefit. In fact,
> when I created the checkstyle configuration I started from the one used by
> Commons Configuration and then tweaked it to shut up a bunch of the
> "errors" I didn't care about and that seemed to have been the convention of
> the existing code base. I'd prefer that all of commons use the same
> checkstyle configuration.
>
+1, that would be great, we could put it in the parent POM and be done with
it once and for all.
Can you have a checkstyle.xml reused that way?
Gary
>
> Ralph
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
