On Feb 10, 2012, at 5:39, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > On 10/02/2012 00:20, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> I have a preference fo juli. > I can work with that.
Is a dependency on JULI better than on common-logging? Or is there some confusion talking about JUL vs JULI? Gary > >> IIRC, Tomcat has a bridge from juli to logging impl, > It is actually the other way around. Tomcat uses a package renamed > commons-logging hard-coded to output to juli by default. It provides a > package renamed full commons-logging impl as well for users that want to > use something else (usually log4j). > >> it would help to keep [pool] dependencies-less. > That is a very big advantage of juli. > > Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
