Dear all, 2012/2/9 Gilles Sadowski <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:02:36AM +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Le 09/02/2012 10:50, Sébastien Brisard a écrit : >> > Hi Luc, >> >> >> >> I agree with you, enums are much better. There are other places in >> >> [math] where we use boolean or even ints for such things. They mainly >> >> came for pre-java 5 era when enums where not available. >> >> >> >> Luc >> >> >> > And what do you think of replacing >> > - transform(double[]) with transform(double[], FORWARD) >> > - inverseTransform(double[]) with transform(double[], INVERSE) >> > (also using enums) ? >> >> It's good too. > > +1 > > Gilles > Please have a look to some comments I've made in MATH-743, if you can spare some time. Best regards, Sébastien
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
