Hi. > [...] > What do you think?
No idea. > @Exceptions: while working on the migration to the new exceptions in > this package, I tried to stick to the rules from Phil/Luc: > > - add @throws clause to javadoc > - add throws declaration to method signature > > for each individual exception that can be thrown. > > This can lead to pretty elaborate signatures, see f.e. > WilcoxonSignedRankTest#wilcoxonSignedRankTest(double[], double[], boolean) > > Is it ok like that? I strongly prefer _not_ to have the (unchecked) exceptions in the signature. [Arguments mentioned numerous times in previous discussions...] Best, Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
