On 7 January 2012 13:21, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:23 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6 January 2012 14:39, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Any reason why some plugin versions are in properties and others not?
>>>
>>> I think the properties are mainly needed for plugins that can be used
>>> in both reporting and build sections.
>>>
>>> Are there any missing properties you wish to add?
>>>
>>
>> I just thought it would be nicer to have all these versions in properties
>> in one place. When I first saw the properties I wondered why are some here
>> and some not. I just thought of it for consistency.
>
> +1
>
> It also allows easy overriding the plugin version in a child pom only by
> redeclaring the property.

Patches welcome.

> - Jörg
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to