Hola Claudio! On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Claudio Squarcella <squar...@dia.uniroma3.it> wrote: > Hey Simone, > > > > trying to put it all together (thanks James, Matthew): > > * Weighted<W> is fully generic without restrictions on the type of > weight W > * different properties of weights are specified with interfaces: e.g. > Summable, HasZero, Comparable... > * each algorithm requires the weights to implement one or more of the > above interfaces based on needs, and only works with related methods > abstracting from the actual type of weight. For example sum(W > weight) for Summable. >
this is interesting - at a first read looked like an over engineered layer, but it perfectly model the weight domain... can you provide a patch containing such classes and see them in action in current implemented algos? > Now, IFF you like that... what shall we do with Double, Integer, etc? > uhm I think we can get rid of them, this is something depending on the domain in which algorithms are applied. Looking forward to hear from you soon! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
