Hi, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I am thinking of a different package name, not just version for VFS on > Java 7 because we might want to release more VFS2-based versions that do > break binary compatibility. > > We can retain the VFS name and brand for the project, but I'd prefer > o.a.c.vfs<n> to be for VFS2 based work and to create o.a.c.filesystem (or > fs) for Java 7 FileSystem-based work. > > Thoughts? Until now we had the policy to add the major number to the package name i.e. this is org.apache.commons.vfs3 here. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
