Hi,

Gary Gregory wrote:

> I am thinking of a different package name, not just version for VFS on
> Java 7 because we might want to release more VFS2-based versions that do
> break binary compatibility.
> 
> We can retain the VFS name and brand for the project, but I'd prefer
> o.a.c.vfs<n> to be for VFS2 based work and to create o.a.c.filesystem (or
> fs) for Java 7 FileSystem-based work.
> 
> Thoughts?

Until now we had the policy to add the major number to the package name i.e. 
this is org.apache.commons.vfs3 here.

- Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to