Gary Gregory wrote: > Good day to you all: > > I have prepared Commons Codec 1.6-RC2, again, per Sebb's suggestion. I am > not calling it RC3 because there are no changes in source files from the > last RC. The only difference is that I built from a fresh checkout of the > RC2 svn tag. > > The changes from RC1 are what Sebb found: > - EOL in sources > - Cruft from a dirty build, so I built this RC as I should have the first > time around with: > - mvn clean > - mvn deploy -Prelease > > Tag: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/tags/commons-codec > -1.6-RC2 > > Site: > > https://people.apache.org/builds/commons/codec/1.6/RC2/ > > Binaries: > > <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-224/> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-290/ > > The link above includes checksum files. > > [ ] +1 release it > [ ] +0 go ahead, I cannot take the time > [ ] -1 no, do not release it because:
+1 > This VOTE is open for 72 hours, until November 23 2011, 14:00 EST. Change the history ... ?!? :) Build went fine for my compiler zoo (apart from the well-known problem with IBM JDK 5) on Linux/amd64. I had none of Olivers problems with Java 5 versions. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
