Matt Benson-2 wrote > > ... maybe it's worth that tiny bit of extra pain to reach that slightly > larger audience... > It is not a tiny bit when you accumulate it; and JEXL3 would not reach a larger audience because it allows deployment on Java 1.5. This is a wrongly imposed cost with no benefit.
-- View this message in context: http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Can-the-next-version-major-version-of-a-project-require-Java6-i-e-drop-Java-1-5-tp4160635p4161848.html Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org