On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:14 PM, henrib <hen...@apache.org> wrote: > Of course I am frustrated; I'm old enough to know it will pass... > > More importantly, I now need to re-evaluate whether JEXL as an Apache > Commons project is a library I can continue to use and recommend for > professional usage; it has a shallow community, only had one committer for > the past 3-4 years and a stringent release police that make extensibility, > bug fix and RFE availability impossible to expect and even less to predict.
It seems that we should focus more on "release early, release often". I have not pushed a component of mine to Commons because it would take me for ever to release it - but I need it now. Sometimes releasing at the asf means endless discussions, and sometimes even ego trips. I would really appreciate if we as project could get more into some kind of agile state of development. Cheers Christian > > Ergo, the simple question I needed to ask. :-) > Cheers, > Henrib > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/JEXL-Jexl-2-1-tp4147180p4147799.html > Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
