On 28 November 2011 14:35, henrib <hen...@apache.org> wrote: > @since, will do. > > On the Script interface, I suspect anyone implementing it derives > ExpressionImpl which does carry default implementations...
That then might be an acceptable break in compatibility. > On the new Script methods (getVariables etc), I'd like to keep the API > simple and avoid multiplying interfaces (esp for 2/3 methods at a time). > > Thanks for the review The additional final qualifiers could easily be removed and the set methods deprecated. > Henrib > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/JEXL-binary-compatibility-tp4114818p4115380.html > Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
