Because we've added features through three new methods and five new OS_* fields, should the version be 3.1 instead of a maintenance release?
-1: I've fixed the Clirr report, it now says "Comparison Version: 3.0.1", not "(,3.0.2)" Gary On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > A first pass at 3.0.2. I rolled back the comparators to be > considered/argued about for 3.0.3. > > RC1 is available here: > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0.2-RC1/ > > SVN: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_2_RC1/ > > Website: > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0.2-RC1/site/ > > This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 20800 GMT 12 > November 2011. > > ================ > [ ] +1 > [ ] -1, with reason > ================ > > Hen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
