Will have a look when Gilles finished the change next week. 
Dietmar

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Gilles Sadowski [mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org] 
Gesendet: Montag, 7. November 2011 15:22
An: dev@commons.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [math] CMA-ES input sigma

> [...]
> > 
> > P.S. Please don't forget that the "CMAESOptimizer" is not yet upgraded
to
> >      use the new "optimize" API (for simple bounds); I intended to
change
> >      that by next week.
> 
> Ah, thanks. This explain some strange behaviour I get. I will let you 
> adapt this, for now I will simply set the boundaries both in the 
> constructor and in the call to optimize. I guess the constructot will 
> be changed later so the boundaries are set only in optimize, is this right
?

Exactly.


Gilles

> [...]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to