On 21 October 2011 00:07, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 October 2011 23:31, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a mixed feeling about this release. If I remember well this code >> predates Java 5, and despite the amazing work that has been put into to >> generify the code, I wonder if it has been sufficiently thought out for a >> Java 5 world. > > I'm inclined to agree; it would be counter-productive to release > version 1.0 and then find that there need to be changes that break the > API. > > I just did a build, and there are a lot of missing @Override markers. > > Also lots of raw types in the Test classes. > > If there are pressing reasons to provide a release for testing > purposes, then create a snapshot for developers to use. > > At a pinch, I suppose one could release a 0.n version, and then break > the API if necessary in 1.0. > But it would need to be made clear that the API was not finalised. >
Also just noticed: @author tags $Date$ SVN properties @SuppressWarnings without any justification why it is safe to do so Maven reports some warnings about deprecated settings --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
