On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 28 September 2011 18:20, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:12 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 28 September 2011 18:08, <ggreg...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Author: ggregory
>>>>> Date: Wed Sep 28 17:08:45 2011
>>>>> New Revision: 1176967
>>>>>
>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176967&view=rev
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> Remove tag, fixing POM and will retag for RC1
>>>>
>>>> Please tag as RC2 instead; tags are supposed to be immutable.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Even if a vote is never called?
>>
>> Yes, it's easier to trace later.
>>
>> Tags are very cheap to create; it's just not worth creating possible
>> confusion by allowing them to be recreated in some circumstances.
>
> What confusion is there in recreating something that never really existed?
>
> "Hello everyone, time to vote on RC67"
> "WHAT? Did I miss the earlier ones?"
> "No, I just screwed up a lot".
>
> I regularly tag and ditch.
Can't parse above. Do you mean you regularly commit tags and then over-write
them? I agree with Sebb that since they are cheap, there is no reason to
"reuse"
And hey, when was the last time you looked at an RCn with n<3? He he.
Phil
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
