On 9/19/11 1:08 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Phil Steitz wrote: > >> On 9/18/11 2:43 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> Sure. I was under the Impression that 2 subclasses reused the fields. >> Well, they (GOP, GKOP and others) do use the closed field; but IMO >> that is not enough justification for the complexity of having them >> there and the ugliness of the UnsupportedOperationExceptions and >> nonsense values returned in the base implementations of pool stats. >> So, I will go ahead and remove the base classes. > Or simply use abstract classes and keep only the relevant code?
That would make sense if there were a nontrivial amount of useful code to keep or if we wanted to get rid of the interfaces. I don't see either of those as compelling. Do you? Phil > > - Jörg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
