Yes, I think this is a good idea. I will do it. On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29 August 2011 07:11, Greg Sterijevski <gsterijev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > My apologies, I was looking at the original c code and neglected to > notice > > the cast. > > Perhaps add a comment to the cast to make it clearer? > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Greg Sterijevski > > <gsterijev...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> Yes, you seem to have a good point. My bad. > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com > >wrote: > >> > >>> Why? > >>> > >>> Isn't that what casting as an (int) does? > >>> > >>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Greg Sterijevski > >>> <gsterijev...@gmail.com>wrote: > >>> > >>> > While probably not a big deal, shouldn't the initial element in the > >>> array > >>> > mt > >>> > be 'anded' by 0xffffffffL? > >>> > > >>> > mt[0]= (int) longMT & 0xffffffffL; > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
