On 17 August 2011 06:18, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2011-08-17, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 17 August 2011 03:42, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> On 2011-08-15, sebb wrote:
>
>>>> For input, there might be a use case for leaving the stream open, in
>>>> case some kind of recovery is possible.
>
>>>> It would be useful to have a way of determining the input file pointer
>>>> at the point of failure.
>
>>> stream.getBytesRead() or are you thinking about anything else?
>
>> That would be fine.
>
> I'm not sure whether we need to do anything for that.  The streams
> already count the bytes and you can access it when an exception occurs.
> We might want to revisit the exception messages whether they can include
> some sort of byte count.
>
> For "normal users" of compress I don't expect that information to be too
> useful, though.  Most users won't be familiar with the details of the
> format.  It may be useful for us during debugging or when bugs get
> reported.

Yes, that was my main concern.

> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to