I may have missed the discussion... but are we releasing a Java 5
genericized version first before major refactoring?

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Elijah Zupancic <eli...@zupancic.name> wrote:
> Hi Simo,
>
> Yes, the patch is binary compatible with the old chain with one exception:
>
> org.apache.commons.chain.web.servlet.ServletHeaderValuesMap on line
> 97. Previously the API was returning Set<Entry<String,
> Enumeration<String>> when by all indications it actually should have
> been returning Set<Entry<String, String[]>>. I believe that I fixed a
> previously undiscovered bug there.
>
> Right now, none of the unit tests are using generics and they all
> pass. So, I assume that we have a backwards compatible API.
>
> Thanks,
> -Elijah
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Simone Tripodi
> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi Elijah,
>> looking at the patch, it seems that v2.0 is binary compatible to old
>> chain, right?
>> I mean, if in a my hypothetical application I would upgrade to v2
>> (generics a part) old code should continue working, right?
>> TIA, and count also on me!
>> All the best, have a nice day!
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Elijah Zupancic <eli...@zupancic.name> 
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Matt,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the advice. I've created a JIRA issue for the patch
>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-53) and signed and
>>> submitted the CLA.
>>>
>>> As for JSF, I believe I made a mistake in changing the API to use the
>>> office jsf API instead of the myfaces API that was previously being
>>> used. I went that route because I couldn't find a 2.0 version of the
>>> faces api in the Maven repo, but it looks like it is available on the
>>> myfaces project site, so I will revert the dependency to using myfaces
>>> and downgrade to 2.0.
>>>
>>> I'll start work on migrating the test cases / mocking to a newer junit
>>> and mockito, when I know that the changes will be accepted.
>>>
>>> Thanks again for the help!
>>>
>>> -Elijah
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi, Elijah--
>>>>
>>>>  I am neither a develop nor even a user of chain, so my comments will
>>>> be high-level.  Firstly, by all means upgrade to whatever JUnit 4
>>>> release version you like, e.g. 4.8.2.  Next, I personally am a big fan
>>>> of Mockito, so no complaints here on that account.  I can't guarantee
>>>> noone else would complain, but [chain] has been fairly unloved for a
>>>> good while.  As for JSF 2.1, is there something this achieves that
>>>> wouldn't be equally well accomplished by simply upgrading to 2.0?
>>>> This would give [chain]'s JSF support (which I personally hadn't
>>>> realized existed) a potentially better combination of
>>>> doing-things-that-couldn't-easily-be-done-with-older-APIs vs. broadest
>>>> possible applicability.
>>>>
>>>> Finally, as you don't seem to be a committer your final submission in
>>>> this regard would be best recommended in the form of a JIRA issue, and
>>>> your patches in (albeit large) patch form.  In addition to this, the
>>>> scope of these changes indicates it best IMO that you submit an
>>>> Individual Contributor License Agreement governing your contributions
>>>> to the ASF.  See http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas for details on
>>>> how to do this.
>>>>
>>>> Regards and welcome,
>>>> Matt
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Elijah Zupancic <eli...@zupancic.name> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> I've just finished my proof of concept for an upgrade to Apache chain.
>>>>> I would love to get this into a svn branch. I'm not quite sure what
>>>>> the procedure is to do that, but the code can be found here for
>>>>> review:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://elijah.zupancic.name/projects/commons-chain-v2-proof-of-concept.tar.gz
>>>>>
>>>>> And here is a diff:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://elijah.zupancic.name/projects/uber-diff
>>>>>
>>>>> At a high level, I have incorporated the following features in this
>>>>> proof of concept:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Global upgrade to the JDK 1.5
>>>>> * Added @Override annotations
>>>>> * Upgraded to the Servlet 2.5 API
>>>>> * Upgraded to the Faces 2.1 API
>>>>> * Upgraded to the Portlet 2.0 API
>>>>> * Upgraded the Maven Parent POM version
>>>>> * Added generics support to Command so that Command's API looks like:
>>>>>
>>>>> public interface Command<T extends Context> {
>>>>> ...
>>>>>    boolean execute(T context) throws Exception;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> * Servlet and Portlet packages now provide Genericized APIs.
>>>>> * All dicey changes have been marked with a comment with my name: (elijah)
>>>>>
>>>>> More or less the work to updated Chain was straight forward albeit
>>>>> time consuming.
>>>>>
>>>>> If everyone is on board for this update, I would like to upgrade the
>>>>> test cases to use a new version of JUnit. However, this leads to a few
>>>>> questions:
>>>>>
>>>>> * What version of JUnit should I use?
>>>>> * Would it be ok to use Mockito for mocking instead of the home grown
>>>>> mocking classes already contained in the project?
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know what you think. Getting this far has been a couple
>>>>> weeks worth of on and off work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> -Elijah
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to