In that case, I'm quite happy to test one of the options which have been suggested within the framework of linear solvers. I could for example try and implement the Obervable/Observer option, and see how it goes. Sébastien
2011/8/9 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: > On 09/08/2011 18:50, Greg Sterijevski wrote: >> I think you hit the nail on the head with the comment: >> >> "... but also the time to >> experiment. Only the latter will be able to tell if the design is good. >> And this must take time so that all the potential pitfalls can be ..." >> >> Maybe this is chumming the water with more flotsam and jetsam, but a lot of >> the issues that arise in working out the best design ultimately revert to >> trying out a bunch of deadends [design by monte carlo ;)] The discussion on >> the list [from my rather limited history] seems to try to foresee all >> possible drawbacks with a design. This inevitably devolves into heated >> discussion and diminishing progress. >> >> Would it be possible to fork the trunk of the source tree to an >> "experimental branch"? > > The idea has been around almost as long as the ASF has: > > http://incubator.apache.org/learn/rules-for-revolutionaries.html > > Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
