On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Raman Gupta <rocketra...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > Perhaps I'm missing something, but what exactly is wrong with simply > using slf4j? It is an extremely simple, widely used library that > provides out of the box hooks for many logging frameworks including > log4j and logback, simple to configure (i.e. drop the appropriate jars > in and thats it), and works out of the box in an OSGi environment? The > only downside appears to be that it is not an Apache project. So what.
The biggest issue I have with SLF4J is figuring out the dependencies that I need. I really detest having an API jar and then an implementation/bridge jar. I find that too annoying. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
