Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2011-07-27, Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> Different approach: Create out of them separate Maven artifacts. > > This probably is what I had in mind when I suggested to move them - > along with the testcases - somewhere outside of trunk. I just didn't > know the proper nomenclature and likely don't know how to do that > properly, I'm an Ant guy and all that. 8-) > > Technically that would mean we'd add a reactor for Compress with two > artifacts. One would be what Compress is right now and one would hold > "interop tests" or something similar. Is this correct?
Not necessarily. You may also define a profile that activates the additional tests (and the additional dependencies for your large test files). > I'm with Ted and would only create one artifact for all interop tests. > And I'd probably prefer to keep the small tests with the code as unit > tests. AFAICS Ted proposed one artifact for the test files i.e. the (large) archives you will operate on in your tests. That's also possible, but I'd not recommend it, since I expect you probably will never change them again, while a combined ZIP artifact with all the test files *will* change (every time you add a new one). - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
