> My guess is that the final declarations came out of an attempt to avoid
> warnings by over zealous code inspectors that allowing getters and setters
> of private fields to be over-ridden is dangerous.  The warning is correct.
> The response was not.  The correct response is to not have the private
> fields and make the getters and setters be abstract.

Your guess is correct. I do apologize for this. I attached patch
MATH-581-05.patch to correct this.

Best regards,
Sebastien

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to