On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > We had an RC3 vote so shouldn't remove; but I'm very happy if you've > time to do an RC4. I've been managing about enough time to look at the > outstanding issues before I'm back to the diapers. >
That's why I asked... I couldn't find the evidence of the RC3 vote for some reason, but I'll take your word for it. > Which is 'what's in JIRA' plus the discussion on the text.translate/Range API. JIRA seems clear, no? Do we need to wait on the other issue, then? Matt > > Hen > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hen, >> Despite my pathological fear of the RM role, especially in >> conjunction with Maven, I am contemplating picking this up since my >> kids are so much older than yours. Do you have any objection to my >> removing your RC3 svn tag? >> >> br, >> Matt >> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> These are the current blocking items in play afaik: >>>>> >>>>> * Email thread - what else should implement Formattable? >>>> >>>> Sounds like this is now: >>>> >>>> * Update javadoc for Mutable classes to indicate that they can't do >>>> much to make them useful in String.format. >>>> >>>> We could consider making Fraction, StopWatch and others use Format >>>> under the hood and thus implementing Formattable, but I'm not sure I >>>> see much point. I also don't see adding Formattable later on as a >>>> backwards compat issue, but maybe I'm being dim (flu + newborn, >>>> verrrrry dim right now). >>> >>> Note, I don't consider either of these to be required for 3.0. I've >>> documented the javadoc as LANG-698 and the consideration of adding >>> Formattable as LANG-699. >>> >>>>> * LANG-696/Email thread - getShortName. What to do with the (String) >>>>> variant. Remove others. >>>> >>>> I've updated LANG-696. I think we need to decide which of the following we >>>> want: >>>> >>>> getSimpleName(Map.Entry.class) => "Entry" [Matches JVM] >>>> getSimpleName(Map.Entry.class) => "Map.Entry" [Matches Lang 2.x] >>> >>> I think we should think more on this (i.e. post 3.0) and it's not the >>> end of the world to be stuck with getSimpleName until 4.0. >>> >>> Hen >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
