+1. No concerns here, the more the merrier. On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > I don't see any minimal potential risk, BCEL is well known and widely > adopted and JCS could be kind of commons-cache (dormant) finalization. > Full support from my side. > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> As Jakarta winds down, we are looking for sustainable homes for couple >> of Java libraries -- BCEL [1] and JCS [2]. These aren't very different >> from many Commons libraries in size, number of developers, list >> traffic etc. Would Commons be interested in accepting these? Couple of >> the developers already have Commons karma, we will request karma for a >> couple more if the move happens. >> >> Background threads in Jakarta land here [3, 4]. >> >> -Rahul >> >> [1] http://jakarta.apache.org/bcel/ >> [2] http://jakarta.apache.org/jcs/ >> [3] http://markmail.org/thread/vtgzc5pqsjol4cft >> [4] http://markmail.org/thread/uacopjsbw7xkw4q7 >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
