Hey,

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The bigger issue in my mind is why a Range does not extend Pair. It's pretty
> clear (to me at least) that a range is a pair of values.

Mathematically speaking a Range also has information about whether the
high and low bounds are inclusive or exclusive... but commons lang
Ranges are always inclusive so I guess it's not concerned with that
and can be treated as just a pair.

> Because the Pair is in our tuple package, it means that it should follow
> tuple logic and be an ordered list of elements, in this case two elements.
>
> This means that the methods that Range has that are not in Pair could be
> moved there.
>
> Gary

Regards,
James

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to