Hello,
Perso not blocker for me, the most important is to have easy setup for
ide and checkstyle files configured and not loose to much time with
that.

IMHO it's just a "taste" question (in my country some prefers Bordeaux
and others Bourgogne :-) ).

/Olivier

2011/5/16 Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>:
> Hi Maurizio!
> indeed, sometimes such style makes me smile because brings back old memories 
> :)
> Well, I was too young at '90 to program - anyway I was a SuperMario
> champion - but my professors at University used that style :P
>
> Jokes a part, I thought that code style was a trivial topic, but at
> this point a vote makes sense, to find a general consensus.
> Thanks!!!
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara
> <maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Phil probably hit the nail on the head: contributors might have
>> problem to incorporate patches, the main risk is that every patch
>> contain a lot of noise and it's not good for the sake of reviewing.
>> I have no problem with most of the conventions (which are the default
>> settings of IntelliJ IIRC).
>> The only one that I don't like so much is the new line brace. It take
>> me back to 1990 when I used to code in C.
>> What about if we put to the vote it between ognl committers?
>>
>> On 16 May 2011 00:02, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 5/15/11 2:44 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>>> 2011/5/14 Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>:
>>>>> Hi all guys,
>>>>> OGNL code is formatted using a mixture of various styles, I hope
>>>>> everybody agrees on adopting one unique style.
>>>>> I propose to adopt the Maven Style[1] that is already widely adopted
>>>>> and supported by IDEs.
>>>>> Thoughts? Objections? If agree I would quickly proceed, just let me know!
>>>>> SImo
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/conventions/code.html
>>>>>
>>>> -0 (not binding)
>>>>
>>>> 1. "Blocks: Always enclose with a new line brace." wastes lines if you
>>>> want to print the sources.
>>>>
>>>> 2. "White space: One space after control statements and between
>>>> arguments (i.e. if ( foo ) instead of if(foo)), myFunc( foo, bar, baz
>>>> ) instead of myFunc(foo,bar,baz))."
>>>>
>>>> I think that is ugly. Is there a reason behind this?
>>>>
>>>> 3. "Line wrapping: Always use a 120-column line width for Java code
>>>> and Javadoc."
>>>>
>>>> Line width of 120 is likely cause line wrapping when diffs are send
>>>> through e-mail and problems when doing side-by-side comparison. I am
>>>> not so worried about Java code, as lengthy statements are rare, but
>>>> more about Javadoc.
>>>>
>>>> My personal preference is "Java conventions", but with spaces instead of 
>>>> tabs.
>>>>
>>>> Are there any projects in Commons that already use the "Maven" style?
>>>
>>> I don't think so.  I agree with your comments, Konstantin, as do
>>> most current Commons sources.  Our convention here is that
>>> components maintain their own checkstyle configs and those actively
>>> working on components determine how they want the sources to look.
>>> So it comes down to a question for the [ognl] committers to decide.
>>> One point to consider is that strange settings (and I would
>>> personally call at least 1 and 2 above "strange") may make it harder
>>> for new contributors to get involved and for committers to evaluate
>>> and incorporate patches.
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Konstantin Kolinko
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Maurizio Cucchiara
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>



-- 
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy
http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to