Would you guys be willing to start at 4.0-SNAPSHOT so there's a direct continuation of versioning? Just a novel thought since it might help others to see it's not a re-invention of OGNL, per se, but the continuation of it.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On May 11, 2011, at 9:36, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:28 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I'd be inclined to keep the current package name and Maven ids during >>> (most of) incubation. >> >> Disagreed. Changing package names etc. should be the first steps in >> incubation. As should be the publication of an early release with the >> new package names. This allows end users to pick up as soon as >> possible while still be upwards compatible. > > +1 > Gary > >> >> If you don't do that, then users might prefer to wait "until the major >> change is done". >> >> >> >> -- >> I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye) >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
