On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 to rename getShortClassName to getSimpleName; sitting on top of the >> >> JDK getSimpleName and providing null safety and whatever other >> >> features are needed (for example array encoding). >> > >> > You must mean deprecate getShortClassName (to remove in 4.0) and add >> > getSimpleName. Right? >> >> Nope. Remove getShortClassName and add getSimpleName. We're not >> released yet so we can (and should) still make backwards compat >> changes. >> >> Hen > > getShortClassName is in 2.6.
So? It can be removed in 3.0 if it's pointless and replaced by getSimpleName. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
