On 18 April 2011 23:11, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > -1 > > POM changes can have big impacts, especially if an erroneous one is > released. It's not that I don't trust the person who makes the changes, but > I would like several people to approve the changes before the ecosystem is > impacted. Checks and balances. > > If it turns out I am the only -1 vote, I will remove my vote :-) > > Paul
I should have pointed out that the CP Pom is not automatically inherited by components; each component has to decide to use the new version (by updating the component POM). So if the version turns out to be faulty, we just don't use it. > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:40 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> As suggested by Hen, we should be able to use lazy consensus voting >> for Commons Parent pom releases. >> >> [ ] +1 let's use lazy consensus voting for Commons Parent pom in future >> [ ] -1 why not? >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
