I think "tuple" is a better package name. In geo-coordinates, I don't think it's proper to call Longtitude a key and Latitude a value. It's just a tuple of values. Same thing for 3d dimension space, etc.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Stephen Colebourne > <scolebou...@joda.org>wrote: > > > On 12 April 2011 17:10, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Stephen Colebourne > > > <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote: > > >> The [collections] KeyValue class was a mistake. [lang] Pair is a > > >> better more general concept. > > >> > > >> The only thing I'd consider with [lang] Pair now is whether it should > > >> move to its own package, in case it grows later (primitive versions). > > >> > > > > > > oacl.tuple? > > > > +1 > > Gary > > > > If we create a package, that would be the name I'd choose. > > Stephen > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > Thank you, > Gary > > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ > http://garygregory.com/ > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >
