> I'm having a problem distinguishing "dormant" from "attic". Just because one > had releases and the other didn't they should go to different places for > their final resting place?
I also fear this leads to more confusion than it helps. > I'm not clear why commons should have an attic (or dormant) subproject. The > attic is perfectly capable of housing Commons Jelly. It already contains > several Jakarta subprojects. > > My proposal would be to move all of the dormant subprojects and any inactive > proper projects to Apache Attic. I guess it's easier to resurrect them if they stay "in-house" cheers, Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
