On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
<knst.koli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/4/8 Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> just a reminder. Such a javadoc comment for a method is completely
>> superfluous:
>>
>> ============ %< =============
>> /**
>> * {@inheritDoc}
>> */
>> ============ %< =============
>>
>> This is what the javadoc nowadays does by default ...
>>
>
> Yes, but personally I like them as a good reminder when looking though the
> code.
> (Or as "nothing more to add").
I feel more comfortable seeing them as well (I'm almost certainly the
primary perpetrator of these throughout [lang]); can Checkstyle handle
not requiring a Javadoc comment for example wherever an @Override
annotation is found?
Matt
>
> There is @Override, but it is omitted in some cases when it is 1.5 or earlier.
>
> Best regards,
> Konstantin Kolinko
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
