On 5 April 2011 21:04, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > I tend to use this syntax: > > @version $Revision$, $Date$
Please don't use $Date$, because it makes checking releases much harder. > I don't use $Id$ because it's a bit long and verbose, but I don't mind if > someone else uses it. > > Git proponents will probably argue to remove this tag because it interferes > with the checksumming. > > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > > Le 05/04/2011 10:16, Simone Tripodi a écrit : >> >> Hi all guys, >> after the @author tag, I'm here to ask to clarify *to me* how @version >> shall be used in Commons :) >> I saw various usage across components: >> >> - In [digester] we just use $Id$ on top of the license header; >> - In [pool] we often used @version $Id$ in the class javadoc; >> - In [discovery] we mixed usage of @version $Id$, @version $Revision$ >> and @version $Revision$ $Date$ >> >> Which one fits better for our components? >> I'd say that @version $Id$ is the most complete, but let's reason >> about it together :P >> >> Since I'm taking care of [discovery], I'd like to fix once for all >> these minor issues :) >> Many thanks in advance, have a nice day! >> Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
