Henri Yandell wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 4/4/11 2:18 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>>>>> I thought we had settled on '@author Apache Software Foundation',
>>>>> Did we? TBH I find that pretty pointless and nothing more than noise.
>>>>> I'd be in favor of removing them all together.
>>>> I agree with Torsten.  I got stalled in DBCP/pool because at least
>>>> some ppl thought we needed to get permission from all of the long
>>>> gone @authors to nuke their tags.  Personally, I am ready to just
>>>> nuke 'em if others do not object.
>>>
>>> I am +1 for nuking and +1 for documenting the "no @author tags" decision
>>
>> +1, and done for Lang.
> 
> Btw:
> 
> for i in `find . -type f -name '*.java'`; do (echo 'g/@author/d'; echo
> 'w') | ed $i; done
> 
> and check with svn diff of course :)

sed -i -s -e '/@author/d' `find . -type f -name '*.java'`

SCNR :)

- Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to