On 4/4/11 7:19 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Phil, > I think I can be helpful there, but I din't understand which steps are > needed to get the trunk in a better order, I would be glad to fix it! > Thanks in advance! :) Thanks, Simo!
After cleaning up my local checkout, I see now that things are not as messy as I thought. Here are some things we need to get sorted to get a reasonable site build working from trunk. 0) temporarily disable clirr, as there is no earlier version of the artifact to compare against 1) fix many javadoc and checkstyle warnings 2) post-1.5.6 release cleanup - update changes.xml, release notes, doap, javadoc nav link I will take care of 2) if you don't beat me to it. Item 1) is not strictly necessary, but getting things a little better would be good before publishing the javadoc on the site. We should probably also add some text on the main page explaining the plan for 2.0. Phil > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 4/4/11 4:25 AM, sebb wrote: >>> On 4 April 2011 07:36, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I will be sending the 1.5.6 release announcement shortly. When >>>> updating the pool website, I started by trying to use trunk, but >>>> found the output confusing, since we are in process of changing the >>>> groupId and package name. I decided, therefore, to publish based on >>>> the updated 1_5_X branch. Once we get the 2.0 sources consolidated >>>> and site build repaired, we can publish an updated version. The >>>> site now being replicated has correct download page, javadoc links, >>>> and reports corresponding to the 1.5.6 release. >>> I thought that is what people did anyway - generate the site from the tag? >>> >> I usually update trunk and generate the public site from trunk, so >> it reflects current development. The tag won't work in general, >> because any post-release updates - most importantly the version >> number - won't be reflected in the tag. In any case, the [pool] >> site now reflects the 1.5.x branch. Once we get our 2.0 house in a >> little better order, I think the site should be updated to reflect >> the new stuff. >> >> Phil >>>> Phil >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
