On 23/03/2011 11:00, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Thanks a lot Mark, much more than appreciated :) > I'm +1 to support your idea of moving the current pool2 code in a > branch, then continue the 1.5.5 work. The useful part that IMHO can be > backported are the use of generics, replacing primitive constants with > enumerations, removing some useless wrappers in the PoolUtils class > such the checked pool (we agreed pools are checked due the generics > adoption) and the synchronized pools (they can be implemented via > Proxies). > The rest of the design "improvement" can be ignored, I'm not convinced > at all that current code contains the APIs I would like to use as a > user. > > I don't have an idea yet on how to introduce java.util.concurrent, I > guess there are betters contributors in this area. > > BTW count on me, I should be able to replicate the code modifications > in a short while (1 night should be enough :P)
Brilliant. I'll fix the remaining 1.5.x issues first so we are in a position to do a 1.5.6 release and then I'll look at doing the re-organising. The DBCP backlog looks rather larger so I may create dbcp2 before all of them get fixed. I'll see how things go. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
