So to continue the 3.3 discussion, it looks like Hen created an RC1 nearly 2 years ago... :) But he also tagged the point just before the generics branch was merged back to trunk. Shall we create a 3_X branch from this tag?
Matt On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gmail f*cked me over: > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:53 PM > Subject: Re: [collections] retire or release? > To: Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> > > > > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I'd like to see a 3.3; I think we have a branch that had a lot of >> bugfixes on it before the 4.0 merge. >> >> > +1, if for no other reason than to announce (some of?) the deprecations > planned in 4.0 (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-251 > ). > > >> 4.0 - painful to have a working product there and not release, yet not >> sure there's much point if there isn't enough energy to do subsequent >> releases. >> >> Point taken, but as mature as the codebase is, and let's face it--it's > still mostly the same codebase--I wouldn't expect ongoing maintenance to be > nearly the chore that getting 4.0 ready has been. > > Matt > > >> Hen >> >> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Obviously it sucks how long it's been since we've had a release. >> Apparently >> > Stephen C was the heart & soul of the project. :) I've been trying to >> make >> > a little time for it lately, but it would seem that several of us across >> the >> > project have been somewhat short of time for the past couple of years >> now. >> > I just hate to see us retire it when we're *so* close to having 4.0 >> > ready.... aren't we? >> > >> > Matt >> > >> > On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Jochen Wiedmann >> > <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com>wrote: >> > >> >> Release, then retire? >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Seeing this bug reported for the Nth time: >> >> > >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-371 >> >> > >> >> > I wonder if collections should be declared dead. It's a dumb bug, >> >> > (removeAll calling retainAll), and users have had to put up with it >> >> > for years now. >> >> > >> >> > Hen >> >> > >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye) >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> > >> > > >