I ran into commons-dbcp-all-1.3-r699049.jar on a tomcat host that I
was looking at the other day.  Googling led me to openEJB, which
appears to bundle and mirror this jar
(o.a.openejb/commons-dbcp-all).  I suspect that what happened is
that they got tired of waiting for dbcp 1.3 and cut a version based
on the revision number above and bundling required classes from pool
1.3 (at least that's what it looks like from the manifest).   My
immediate reaction was to encourage the OpenEJB ppl to upgrade to
the released version of dbcp 1.3 and the latest pool release.  This
led to question above.  Should we just start providing
commons-dbcp-all?   Or should we just point them at release tags to use?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to