I ran into commons-dbcp-all-1.3-r699049.jar on a tomcat host that I was looking at the other day. Googling led me to openEJB, which appears to bundle and mirror this jar (o.a.openejb/commons-dbcp-all). I suspect that what happened is that they got tired of waiting for dbcp 1.3 and cut a version based on the revision number above and bundling required classes from pool 1.3 (at least that's what it looks like from the manifest). My immediate reaction was to encourage the OpenEJB ppl to upgrade to the released version of dbcp 1.3 and the latest pool release. This led to question above. Should we just start providing commons-dbcp-all? Or should we just point them at release tags to use?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org